Glockologe Posted July 21, 2022 at 01:41 PM Share Posted July 21, 2022 at 01:41 PM Am 21.7.2022 at 15:40 , Hollowpoint sagte: Die gehören allesamt entlassen und der Einsatzleiter wegen Totschlag durch Unterlassen für 20 Jahre in den Knast! In den USA kann das passieren. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hollowpoint Posted July 21, 2022 at 01:43 PM Share Posted July 21, 2022 at 01:43 PM Am 21.7.2022 at 15:41 , Glockologe sagte: In den USA kann das passieren. HOFFENTLICH!!! Pour encourager les autres! GRUẞ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glockologe Posted July 21, 2022 at 01:46 PM Share Posted July 21, 2022 at 01:46 PM Das waren die Zeiten als die Briten noch beinharte Säue waren. Es war BTW Voltaire, der sagte, die Briten erachteten es als notwenig, ab und zu einen Admiral zu erschießen um die Anderen, ...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doom Posted July 21, 2022 at 02:56 PM Share Posted July 21, 2022 at 02:56 PM https://mises.org/power-market/police-have-no-duty-protect-you-federal-court-affirms-yet-again Zitat “Neither the Constitution, nor state law, impose a general duty upon police officers or other governmental officials to protect individual persons from harm — even when they know the harm will occur,” said Darren L. Hutchinson, a professor and associate dean at the University of Florida School of Law. “Police can watch someone attack you, refuse to intervene and not violate the Constitution.” Dazu kommt 'qualified immunity': https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/qualified_immunity Zitat Specifically, qualified immunity protects a government official from lawsuits alleging that the official violated a plaintiff's rights, only allowing suits where officials violated a “clearly established” statutory or constitutional right. Einfach wird es nicht die hinter Gittern zu bringen, hoffe aber die schaffen es irgendwie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glockologe Posted July 21, 2022 at 04:22 PM Share Posted July 21, 2022 at 04:22 PM https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/harrison/latest/harrison_oh/0-0-0-10250 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hollowpoint Posted July 21, 2022 at 04:27 PM Share Posted July 21, 2022 at 04:27 PM Sogar die Hunderln sind gesetzlich geschützt! GRUß Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doom Posted July 21, 2022 at 04:34 PM Share Posted July 21, 2022 at 04:34 PM (edited) Am 21.7.2022 at 16:22 , Glockologe sagte: https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/harrison/latest/harrison_oh/0-0-0-10250 Das ist Ohio Recht, nicht Texas, mal sehen ob ich so etwas für Texas finde. EDIT: https://www.newsnationnow.com/danabramslive/charges-in-uvalde-shooting-unlikely-former-prosecutor-says/ Zitat Coggins was a federal prosecutor in the northern district of Texas from 1993 to 2001 and is now in private practice in Dallas. The biggest question for prosecutors, he said, would be how many officers to charge. Nearly 400 responded to the May 24 shooting, in which 19 students and two teachers died. And in Texas, dereliction of duty charges are a second-degree misdemeanor, which might leave families dissatisfied, Coggins said. “It would be almost unprecedented to bring this as a dereliction of duty,” Coggins said. “We investigate officers all the time for actions they take, we very rarely investigate them for actions they don’t take.” Edited July 21, 2022 at 04:37 PM by Doom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glockologe Posted July 21, 2022 at 04:38 PM Share Posted July 21, 2022 at 04:38 PM Ich habe das erstbeste genommen, das gibt es den den meisten Bundesstaaten in irgendeiner Form. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now