Hollowpoint

Ääähhh Harry, SAPHIRE sind in der Regel BLAU! Du meinst wahrscheinlich smaragdgrüne Augen. :mrgreen: GRUß

http://www.alex-in-wonderland.com/GirlsWithGuns/Pictures/index.html GRUß

Nu nu, Leute wie Tom Clancy, Alice Cooper, Bob Dylan, Clint Eastwood, Mehl Gibson, Charlton Heston, Ted Nugent, Elvis Presley, Kurt Russell, Steven Seagal, Tom Selleck, Bruce Willis, J.Lo., und Dolly Parton verleihen dieser Liste schon einen gewissen Glanz! 8) GRUß

Nö, wegen der WUMME natürlich!!! Ich bin ja vieles, aber kein Spagettiträgerfetischist! :mrgreen: GRUß

www.proguncelebrities.com Mmmmhhhh..............SCHMACHT................ GRUß

Dann wird sie springlebendig und quietschvergnügt! :mrgreen: GRUß

Na da schau her! da kennt einer den Oleg Volk noch nicht!!! Guckst Du HIER: www.olegvolk.net GRUß

I BIN A BOARISCHES KAUGÖRRL............ 8) :mrgreen: GRUß

http://www.ctsportsmen.com/news/gun_cartoons.htm Hier eines der vielen Cartoons speziell für Dirty Harry: Auch nicht schlecht: :mrgreen: 8) GRUß

:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: GRUß

http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=politicsNews&storyID=5720042 By Alan Elsner WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The powerful U.S. gun lobby seems poised for victory in a high profile battle to end a ban on some assault weapons and experts say it has also been piling up numerous quiet victories at the state level. A federal ban on certain military-style semi-automatic weapons enacted in 1994 is due to expire on Sept. 13. The Republican congressional leadership, backed by the National Rifle Organization and other gun groups, seems determined to allow the law to lapse. Gun control groups say only vigorous intervention by President Bush could change congressional minds. They concede that the chances of that happening weeks before the Nov. 2 presidential election are zero. Bush has said he would sign the extension of the law if it passed but has not intervened in the debate. "The assault weapons ban has no chance of being extended unless President Bush gets forcefully behind it but Bush has apparently made a naked political calculation," said Jim Kessler of Americans for Gun Safety. Gun owners make up an important part of Bush's political base. The NRA is enthusiastically backing him against Democrat John Kerry. Earlier this month, Congress passed legislation which will allow retired and off-duty law enforcement officers to carry concealed weapons even in states that do not permit them. Bush will sign the bill into law Thursday. Gun proponents have worked hard for 15 years and with considerable success to win the right for Americans to carry concealed weapons. In 1986, only eight states were obliged by law to issue citizens who requested them licenses to carry such weapons. That number has grown to 38, according to the NRA. Ohio's law took effect in January. Last year alone, New Mexico, Colorado, Minnesota and Missouri, where legislators overrode a veto by Gov. Bob Holden, passed "right to carry" laws for applicants who pass a gun training course and a background check. "QUIET REVOLUTION" "We have seen the normalization of the idea that Americans may carry concealed weapons. It is a quiet revolution and it will bring about a certain culture change as we become accustomed to the idea of people in urban as well as rural areas carrying weapons around with them," said Robert Cottrol of the George Washington University law school. Statistics suggest that the number of U.S. households owning firearms has stayed stable or may even have declined slightly in recent years. The data is somewhat uncertain since surveys have produced figures as high as 49 percent and as low as 36 percent. The number of weapons in circulation continues to rise, reflecting the fact that guns are extremely durable and can be maintained in working order virtually indefinitely. Some believe the spread of concealed weapons laws will have little practical effect. "These 'right to carry' laws have swept much of the country and do have great symbolic significance for proponents and opponents but they are full of sound and fury, signifying nothing," said William Vizzard, a criminal justice professor at Cal State Sacramento, quoting Shakespeare's Macbeth. Vizzard said the number of people applying for permits was relatively low and the number of people actually carrying weapons on a daily basis even lower. In Arizona, which recently marked 10 years since passing its "right to carry" law, around 68,000 residents have active permits. The state population last year was 5.6 million. Some proponents now want to make it easier for applicants to get the permits by reducing the mandatory training hours. The data suggests that neither the promises of gun groups that such laws would deter crime, nor the warnings of opponents that they would cause more gun accidents, have come to pass. Kessler of Americans for Gun Safety said his group did not even bother fighting such laws. "They are ineffective in stopping crime but they also seem to be unharmful and have not led to mass shootings the way some on the left feared," he said. MAN BEACHTE VOR ALLEM DEN LETZTEN SATZ!!! Das ist schon eine außergewöhnliche Aussage von einem Waffengegner! :mrgreen: GRUß

Und was lerne ICH daraus: Ich fahre nicht wieder dorthin! Die spinnen doch!!! :evil: GRUß

Nö, der Schwachsinn fällt auch weg. GRUß

Im Prinzip wird die "kriegerische" Optik bei verschiedenen Waffen wieder legal sein: MFD, Bajonettwarze, Klappschäfte u.s.w....... GRUß

In den USA findet z. Z. ein ungeheuerliches Trommelfeuer aus allen Medien-Rohren auf das bevorstehende Auslaufen des "Assault Weapon Ban" am 13.09.2004 statt. DAGEGEN war sogar die Reaktion der Medien auf "Erfurt" ein laues Lüftchen! http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...-2004Jul18.html A decade ago I was privileged to lead a fight with Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) on what for me has become a deeply personal issue: the federal ban on assault weapons. These killing machines had no place on our streets in 1994 and they have no place now. Yet as the days pass, it is becoming clear that many members of Congress are content to skip through the summer months doing nothing while awaiting this fall's greatest prize -- not the elections, but the sunset of the assault weapons ban. Ten years after that great victory we are facing the extinction of an important public safety law that was an unusual piece of bipartisan lawmaking. In 1994 I had the support of two men whom I would rarely call my allies, Republican icons Ronald Reagan and Rudy Giuliani. As a result, Congress was able to put public safety ahead of special-interest politics. What's going on these days, by contrast, is typical political doublespeak. The president speaks publicly in support of the assault weapons ban but refuses to lobby actively for it. The House majority leader, Tom DeLay of Texas, says the president never told him personally that he wants the assault weapons ban renewed, so DeLay isn't going to pass it. There you have it. The president says he supports the assault weapons ban but refuses to lift a finger for it. And the powerful House majority leader -- who does not support the ban -- is pretending that all it would take to pass it is a word from the president. This is a tragic development for many reasons, not the least of which is that the public wants this legislation. A new study, "Unconventional Wisdom," by the Consumer Federation of America and the Educational Fund to Stop Gun Violence, found that a substantial majority of likely voters in 10 states support renewing and strengthening the federal assault weapons ban, as do most gun owners and National Rifle Association supporters. The survey found that: • Voters in Midwestern states supported renewing the assault weapons ban slightly more than those in Southwestern states. Midwestern states (Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan and Missouri) averaged 72 percent support for renewal. Southwestern states (Arizona and New Mexico) averaged 67 percent. In Florida, 81 percent of likely voters support renewing the ban. • Rural states, traditionally seen as very conservative on gun issues, strongly favored renewing the ban. Sixty-eight percent of voters in South Dakota and West Virginia support renewal. • Majorities of gun owners in all but two states favored renewing the ban. Even in those two states, Missouri and Ohio, only slightly less than 50 percent of gun owners and NRA supporters favored renewing the ban. • In nine of 10 states surveyed, union households supported renewing the ban by at least 60 percent. In Pennsylvania, 80 percent of union households supported renewing the ban and 73 percent supported strengthening it. • At least 60 percent of current and former military members and military families supported renewing the ban in all states surveyed. In Wisconsin, more than three-fourths (77 percent) of current and former military members and military families support renewing the ban. In March the Senate passed a renewed ban as an amendment to a gun industry immunity bill, which was the NRA's top legislative priority. President Bush issued a statement of administration policy calling the assault weapons ban amendment "unacceptable." The amendment passed on a bipartisan vote, 52 to 47, but the underlying bill was defeated. It was a stunning loss for the gun lobby. The NRA opposes even a straight renewal of the ban. It maintains that most Americans don't want the ban renewed, let alone strengthened, and that Congress should let the ban expire. Not true. The gun industry is licking its chops waiting for the ban to expire. In an upcoming report from the Consumer Federation of America, "Back in Business," one assault weapon manufacturer's sales and marketing director told us, "When the AWB sunsets, which I fully expect it to do, we will be manufacturing pre-ban style weapons and shipping them to the general public through distribution systems and dealers the very next day without doubt . . . .We look forward to Sept. 14th with great enthusiasm." After 19 years in the Senate, I understand differences of opinions, ideologies and constituencies. What I cannot understand is why congressional leaders and the administration think that the American public won't notice that the ban expired. We'll notice, and they'll be sorry. The writer, a former Democratic senator from Ohio, is chairman of the Consumer Federation of America. GRUß

http://www.nramadness.com/ Der Inhalt ist natürlich Bullshit :evil: :gaga: :puke: , aber die Aufmachung ist absolut professionell! GRUß

Ja ja, so 'ne große blonde, blauäugige Luger ist halt bei den Amis der Inbegriff des Bösen. :mrgreen: GRUß

KLASSE!!! Sehr schön formuliert! Nur schade, dass die Grünfinken sich über diesen Brief lediglich amüsieren werden. Diese Brut ist unbelehrbar! :evil: GRUß

Henry ist ein Gesinnungstäter......Harharhar...... :mrgreen: GRUß

S&W macht mobil, bei Arbeit, Sport und Spiel. :mrgreen: Was fällt mir zum Thema Waffe ein: Sportgerät, sportliche Herausforderung (vor allem der .44-er), schöne Freizeitbeschäftigung, das Tor in die herrliche Welt des Wiederladens, nette Menschen im Schützenverein, Mittel zur wirksamen Selbstverteidigung )wenn's gar nicht anders geht), weil es einfach Spass macht und überhaupt..... :mrgreen: GRUß

http://www.etssusa.net/Tools.htm :mrgreen: GRUß

Erstmal die gute Nachricht: Der BDS wird in Kürze definitiv als Schießsportverband anerkannt. Die schlechte: IPSC wird NICHT anerkannt!!! :evil: :flatsch: :gaga: :gaga: :gaga: :puke: :puke: :puke: http://www.wo-system.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Cat=&Number=235518&page=0&view=collapsed&sb=5&o=&fpart=1 GRUß

Selbst wenn Claudia Schiffer und Heidi Klum im Doppelpack für die SPD kandidiert hätten, meine Stimme hätten die SPD trotzdem nicht bekommen! GRUß

GENAU SO IST DEM, ONKELCHEN! 8) GRUß

Heute nachmittag habe ich eine "Antwort" von der unterfränkischen EU-Kandidatin Anja Weisgerber erhalten. Eine Broschüre mit einem Haufen Eigenlob und ein Tütchen mit einer CSU-Gewürzmischung (Pfeffer, Paprika, Glutamat :? Zwiebeln, Tomatenpulver, Koriander, Chilies :mrgreen: ) erhalten. Motto: CSU - Gut gewürzte Politik :| Wie nett Frau Dr. Weisgerber, aber eine Antwort auf mein Schreiben wäre mir lieber gewesen! Ein Tütchen Würzpampe ist NICHT genug um Ihnen am 13.06.2004 meine Stimme zu geben!!! :!: GRUß