Hollowpoint

DSB, Wayne interessiert's? 8) GRUß

Von der Firma COLT halte ich nichts (mehr)! Die einzigen wirklich guten Waffen, die sie je gebaut hatten, waren der SAA, der Detective Special und der Python. Die Original 1911 war ein recht klapperiges Teil und die Edelvarianten davon konnten qualitativ nicht mit denen anderer Hersteller mithalten. Ihre besten Tage sah diese Firma im 19. Jahrhundert. Nur irgendwie sind sie dort stehengeblieben. Zumindest in Sachen Innovationsfähigkeit. COLT wird demnächst wohl den Bach runtergehen........... GRUß

Leider gibt es in D immer noch genug Irre, die mit Druckluftwaffen aller Art auf Menschen schießen! Meistens "just for fun" und ohne jeden konkreten Anlaß! Die Zeitungen sind voll von solchen Vorfällen! GRUß

Ääähhh Leutz, bei dem Ausdruck "Luftdruckwaffen" rollen sich mir immer die Fußnägel auf! DAS HEIßT "DRUCKLUFTWAFFEN"!!! GRUß

Aus dem US-Legalwaffenforum "The High Road": Gun shows and Nazi paraphernalia -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I attended the Concord, NH gun show last weekend. It was a good day and the arena the gun show was at was filled to capacity. As I was entering the arena with my fiance a younger couple was leaving. The girlfriend/wife seemed to be visably upset and at first I thought they were just having a fight. As they both passed me I overheard her say how discusting it was for these vendors to sell Nazi paraphernalia so openly seeing what they stand for and did. As she was just about out of earshot she asked why someone doesn't do something about it right in front of the police officer standing guard at the door. I go to many gun shows and to be honest I never really pay much attention to these vendors or their wares that they are selling. But because this lady had mentioned it I started to count how many vendors were selling this stuff. By the time I left I had counted 21 different vendors. I started to think at that time that we as gun owners want to be shown as normal everyday warm blooded Americans, who strongly believe in our 2nd Amendment rights. As I was looking at all the Nazi stuff for sale, I was wondering how this effects the way the antis think of us as gun owners. As I thought more on it, I couldn't see how it has any positive effect on our image. I would bet that the couple that left were new to the gun world or were just interested in finding out what we are about. I'm thinking they left with a completely wrong idea. What do you think? http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=135378&page=1 Ganz offensichtlich haben die Amis die gleiche besch.....eidene Situation bei deren Waffenbörsen- und Ausstellungen wie wir hierzulande: Legalwaffen und Nazimüll sind eine brisante, ungute Mischung! GRUß

Hi Steven 1000! Bedauerlicherweise bedeutet dieses Urteil erstmal, daß 2/6 in Bayern NUR für HOLLOWPOINT nicht mehr gilt! ABER: dieses Urteil hat sicher einen nicht zu unterschätzenden Einfluß auf die kommenden Verwaltungsvorschriften. Dadurch wurde den 2/6-Befürwortern für WBK "gelb" ganz schön viel Wind aus den Segeln genommen. GRUß

Das ist kein Ungarisch, das ist BULLSHIT!!! :mrgreen: GRUß

@ Klaus: Minden thökölyszági tatrüphelyű gépjármű üzembentartója köteles felelősségbiztosítási szerződést kötni! :mrgreen: GRUß

Jau DANKE Nowlin! Gruß auch an Smithy! 8) FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT!!! :mrgreen: GRUß

Das wird nix nutzen! DAS hatten schon andere Leutz auf der IWA getan. Schillerdoc, Fritz Gepperth und andere. Der Typ ist beratungsresistent!!! :evil: GRUß

Das Urteil gilt erst mal nur für mich selbst. Ich war gleich heute morgen beim LRA Schweinfurt und habe mir den 2/6-Bullshit aus meiner neugelben WBK streichen lassen. Das dauerte gerade mal 2 Minuten. Strich durch den Satz, Dienstsiegel drauf, fertig! 8) Allerdings hat das Bayerische Innenministeriun bislang noch KEINEN Runderlaß an die Waffenrechtsbehörden rausgelassen, in denen diese angewiesen werden, 2/6 bayernweit nicht mehr auf Neugelb einzutragen. Also wird jede neue WBK nach wie vor mit 2/6 versehen. Wem das nicht gefällt, muß auch klagen. Laut meiner Sachbearbeiterin gibt es irgendwo in D ein anderslautendes erstinstanzliches Urteil. Ob dieses rechtskräftig ist, weiß ich nicht! Mal sehen, wie sich mein juristischer Sieg auf die kommenden Verwaltungsvorschriften auswirken wird. Es bleibt spannend!!! Jedenfalls sollte dieses Urteil Euch allen Mut machen, gegen offenkundiges Waffenunrecht juristisch vorzugehen! ES LOHNT SICH!!! MAN KANN GEWINNEN!!! Wer kämpft kann verlieren, wer nicht kämpft hat schon verloren! 8) Und glaubt's mir Leute: GEWINNEN IST GEIL!!! GRUß

Nu was soll das denn?!? Betbruder Börnie's tote Website wieder aus der Gruft zurückholen, oder was?!? Die wurde doch seit Anfang 2004 nicht mehr aktualisiert! Offensichtlich gab's in der Zwischenzeit nicht genügend Massaker, die er hätte ausschlachten können. GRUß

http://onnachrichten.t-online.de/c/39/42/63/3942632.html Nur weiter so!!! 8) GRUß

ICH KANN SIE NICHT HÖÖÖÖREN!!!!!!! :mrgreen: GRUß

http://www.visier.de/2293.html 13. April 2005 FDP-NRW will Novellierung des Waffenrechts Kurz vor den Landtagswahlen in Nordrhein-Westfalen bezog Professor Dr. Andreas Pinkwart, MdB und Landesvorsitzender der FDP-NRW, eindeutig Position gegen unsinnige, weil nicht effektive Verschärfungen im Waffenrecht (die Erklärung folgt im kompletten Wortlaut): . . . . . Nun denn, Ihr NRW-ler hier, jetzt wißt Ihr wohl endgültig, welche Partei die einzig richtige Wahl am 22.05.2005 ist! 8) GRUß

Der Lehrerverband in Bayern läßt kein gutes Haar am FJS-Töchterlein! GRUß

Camera Detects Concealed Weapons By PETER LOFTUS DOW JONES NEWSWIRES April 13, 2005; Page B9 PHILADELPHIA -- A technology that can spot distant galaxies is now being aimed at a more terrestrial concern: the detection of concealed weapons. Researchers have designed ways to use "millimeter-wave" cameras, in combination with regular photography, to detect whether a person is hiding a gun, knife or bomb under his clothing, and to pinpoint the location of the object. For years, astronomers have used radio telescopes that rely on millimeter-wave technology. The U.S. Army has funded some of this research with hopes of developing devices that display images showing concealed weapons on civilians or enemy soldiers. The technology also could be used by police, airport security and convenience stores, researchers say. "The idea is, you take a visual image of a scene, and then you take a millimeter-wave image of the same scene, and the millimeter-wave image is able to see guns hidden underneath someone's clothing," said Rick Blum, an electrical-engineering professor at Lehigh University in Bethlehem, Pa., who has done extensive research on so-called image-fusion technology. Making such a device for soldiers in the field still may be several years away, said William Sander, a consultant to the Army Research Office in Durham, N.C., which has funded Mr. Blum's research. But some private firms already have introduced millimeter-wave sensors designed for civilian uses such as office-building security. Brijot Imaging Systems Inc., Orlando, Fla., has licensed millimeter-wave technology from defense giant Lockheed Martin Corp. Brijot is about to begin shipping a camera system, which resembles an oversize personal computer, and spots weapons on people up to 45 feet away. Also, British defense contractor Qinetiq Ltd. has developed a millimeter-wave imaging device for security at airports and other public areas. Qinetiq says it successfully tested a prototype at London's Gatwick Airport in 2002. Millimeter energy-waves radiate naturally from people and some objects. Some inanimate objects, including metals, are poor emitters of millimeter waves . Millimeter-wave sensors work by detecting the contrast between the waves emitted by a person and the low amount emitted by metals near the person. The data can be processed into an image showing a human body in white and any metallic objects in black. The images don't reveal nudity, researchers say. Alone, millimeter-wave cameras can be of limited use because the images they produce can be grainy. So the challenge has been to find a way to fuse the millimeter-wave images with photo images, either still or moving. Such a fusion could produce what appears to be a regular photo or video of a person, but with outlines of a gun, for instance, hidden under a sweatshirt. Fusing such images isn't easy. One difficulty is "registering" two images of the same scene, or properly lining up matching objects in a picture. Mr. Blum has been working on such a method for nearly a decade. He began his research after hearing from police officers who wanted better surveillance technologies to spot armed suspects. Mr. Blum developed software that automatically fuses such images. He has applied for patents for the software, and his technology is being licensed to a start-up firm, SuperVision Technologies Inc., in Bethlehem. The firm was founded by Leopoldo Mayoral, who has run an engineering-consulting firm that has done work for the Defense Department. One scenario that Mr. Mayoral envisions for the technology is convenience-store security. Video and millimeter-wave sensors could be mounted near the store entrance. If the sensors detect a gun hidden beneath a person's clothing, a device could automatically lock the doors. The store clerk could then question the person to try to determine his intent, Mr. Mayoral said. Though Mr. Blum was initially inspired by law-enforcement needs, he has received funding for his research from the Army Research Office. The office has given Mr. Blum grants totaling about $300,000 over the past five years to develop methods to fuse images taken from different sensors, said Mr. Sander, the Army Research Office consultant. The funding is part of the Army's effort to build on technology such as night-vision goggles, and develop devices that fuse images from multiple sources, Mr. Sander said. And the research isn't limited to images. Mr. Sander said the Army is interested in developing acoustic and odor-based sensors, which could help detect the presence of an enemy soldier lying in wait for an ambush. While SuperVision is in early-stage development, Brijot is about to begin shipping its device in June, said Chief Executive Brian Andrew. The device, known as BIS-WDS, sells for about $60,000, and Mr. Andrew says he has received orders totaling more than $100 million. That high price tag is one potential barrier to widespread deployment of millimeter-wave devices. Mr. Mayoral of SuperVision says he hopes to sell a product for $3,000 to $7,000 initially. Brijot's customers are mainly distributors of security products. Users are likely to include security personnel at commercial buildings, Mr. Andrew said. Brijot's device has a video display that can be monitored by security personnel. But it doesn't show any of the actual millimeter-wave image. Instead, it displays a red bracket on the area of a person's body where a weapon is concealed, and flashes the message "gun detected," according to a video demonstration on Brijot's Web site. One advantage of millimeter wave-based devices such as Brijot's is that they are "passive," Mr. Andrew said. This means they don't send radiation through people, so there are no health concerns. Also, they don't require people to walk through an archway metal detector. In fact, they can be used without anyone knowing that a weapons detector is present, Mr. Andrew said. Mr. Andrew doesn't believe there would be any serious legal ramifications of using such a detection system without the knowledge of the people being monitored. He noted that operators of many public and private buildings have the right to refuse entry to anyone carrying a concealed weapon. "If you can put a video-surveillance camera, you can put this up," he said. One privacy rights advocate said millimeter-wave-based security devices should be used with certain safeguards in place. Beth Givens, director of the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse in San Diego, said that the devices should have built-in mechanisms so they "cannot be used by an operator as a tool for voyeurism." She also thinks the machines shouldn't be used on public streets, and should be limited to buildings or facilities that require heightened security, such as federal office buildings, airports or prisons. GRUß

http://p078.ezboard.com/fguncontrol4778frm11.showMessageRange?topicID=2.topic&start=1&stop=20 :puke: GRUß

Jeder erfahrene Messerkämpfer und/oder Kampfsportcrack würde auf Grund seiner Erfahrung jeden realen Messerkampf nach Möglichkeit vermeiden, wenn's irgendwie geht! Auch ein noch so guter Meister der waffenlosen Nahkampfverteidigung weiß sehr genau, daß beim Messerkampf IMMER ein erhebliches Risiko einer schweren u.U. sogar tödlichen Verletzung besteht. Ganz nach dem Motto "Auch ein blindes Huhn findet mal ein Korn". Wenn mir ein Angreifer mit dem Messer gegenübertreten würde und ich die Optionen "Schußwaffeneinsatz", "eigenes Messer zücken" oder "waffenlose Selbstverteidigung" hätte, würde ich IMMER die Schußwaffe wählen! Sicher ist Sicher!!! GRUß

DIESE Behauptung verstößt gegen die GUNBOARD "Board-Wahr"-Politik!!! 5 Teuronen in die Kindischkassa, aber ZZ (ziemlich zügig)!!! GRUß

Waasd, a Kindischkassa is a Behöltnis, wo die Kindischen a Gööld einilegn müssn, wanns an Schmäh oder an Schmarrn vazölt ham. GRUß

Heißt das nicht "infantile Regression"?!? :?: GRUß

Ich_bins wurde nur auf seinen AUSDRÜCKLICHEN, SEHR PENETRANT UND LAUTSTARK geäußerten Wunsch von mir verwarnt!!! Das mußte mal gesagt werden........ GRUß

Der Großadministrator! GRUß

Willst Du das unbedingt nachprüfen?!? GRUß