Hollowpoint Posted June 15, 2006 at 10:23 PM Share Posted June 15, 2006 at 10:23 PM http://www.nraila.org/News/Read/Releases.aspx?ID=7743 San Francisco Superior Court Rejects Gun Ban; 2nd Amendment Upheld Tuesday, June 13, 2006 NRA Statement on Latest Developments Yesterday, San Francisco Superior Court Judge James Warren struck down the San Francisco handgun ban, asserting that under California law local officials do not have the authority to ban firearms from law-abiding citizens. The National Rifle Association (NRA) opposed the ban from its inception. NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre stated, “This ruling is a major victory for freedom and for the National Rifle Association. Proposition H was an ill-conceived gun ban scheme that would have violated the rights of only the law-abiding in San Francisco. We fought this outrageous attack on the constitutional rights of the good guys and we prevailed. We are determined not to see this gross injustice happen again and will fight any effort by politicians to resurrect this faulty proposal.” The San Francisco gun ban would have prohibited law-abiding city residents from purchasing firearms - rifles, shotguns and handguns - for any lawful reason, whether for self-defense, hunting or recreational shooting. In addition, current law-abiding gun owners would have to surrender their registered handguns to the police. Chris W. Cox, NRA chief lobbyist, stated, “We are pleased with the decision of Judge James Warren of the California Superior Court. In today's ruling, Judge Warren ruled California law prohibits a city or county from banning handgun possession by law-abiding adults. This ruling supports the premise of NRA's argument. The NRA filed its lawsuit soon after Proposition H passed arguing that the proposition was in violation of California preemption laws that say firearm laws are regulated by the state.” The San Francisco Police Officers Association also opposed the ban, stating that the new law nullified "the personal choice of city residents to lawfully possess a handgun for self-defense purposes." Cox continued, “It seems evident that the authors of this measure either intentionally misled voters during the election or authored this proposed measure with gross disregard of California law. Regrettably, the biggest losers were the voters in this municipality who had to bear the considerable financial burden to satisfy the careless political whim of their elected officials.” NRA and its Civil Rights Defense Fund presently support more than 60 cases involving the constitutional rights of gun owners. NRA filed a lawsuit challenging gun confiscations in the wake of Katrina (NRA v. New Orleans) and to clarify CaliforniaÂ’s so-called "assault weapon" law (Hunt v. Lockyer). It successfully challenged the San Francisco gun ban (NRA v. San Francisco), and it is challenging seizures of firearms at New York and New Jersey airports contrary to federal safe passage law (John Torraco and William Winstanley in New York and Gregg Revell in New Jersey). Successes include striking down unconstitutional laws in Wisconsin (State v. Hamdan), New Mexico (Baca v. New Mexico Department of Public Safety), Oregon (State v. Dalgado), and West Virginia (State ex rel. City of Princeton v. Buckner). NRA also supported cases involving successful self-defense, for example, Jeffrey Kinder, Sr., and Jeffrey Kinder III (Arizona) and Tracey Roberts (Iowa). GRUß Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MarcDW Posted June 16, 2006 at 01:19 AM Share Posted June 16, 2006 at 01:19 AM Tja, manchmal arbeiten die Gerichte hier noch richtig. Auf jeden Fall sollte Jedem klar sein, warum man in der NRA oder in DE im FWR sein sollte! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
de50ae Posted June 16, 2006 at 09:24 AM Share Posted June 16, 2006 at 09:24 AM Tolle Sache das!!! Da ich vielleicht mein Praxissemester dort machen kann, freut mich das natürlich besonders Denn auf die Knallerei wollte ich auch bzw. gerade dort nicht verzichten. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MarcDW Posted June 16, 2006 at 10:26 AM Share Posted June 16, 2006 at 10:26 AM Senatorin Frankenstein (in DE vielleicht auch bekannt als Feinstein) hat auch schon bitterlich geweint. Leider wird die jetzt aber nicht aufgeben, sondern anderweitig (illegal) den Legalwaffenbesitzern das Leben schwer machen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hollowpoint Posted June 16, 2006 at 10:49 AM Author Share Posted June 16, 2006 at 10:49 AM Die alte &%$§# wird auch nicht ewig leben! GRUß Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now